Transnational Autistic Identities
Disrupting Ghost Authorship with Digital Discourse
The historic lack of diversity in autism scholarship has affected the way we teach and learn about autistic identities and knowledge across disciplines and spaces. As more autistic authors fight for visibility and representation in social and academic platforms, there remains a dearth of scholarship regarding postcolonial and/or transnational autistic experiences. This is despite the rich discourse prevalent in online communities accessed by autistic users around the world. This paper explores the use of digital discourse analysis to disrupt the academic ghost authorship of autism, which often erases (or evades) intersecting issues of race, language, and nationality in the negotiation of autistic knowledge and identities. Scholars who study or collaborate with online communities can investigate the ways this knowledge is constructed across cultural and political borders, thereby holding space for underrepresented autistic perspectives.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).